summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>2020-12-11 16:17:41 +0100
committerMichał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>2020-12-11 18:19:11 +0100
commitb0efa69df19e722ea87fa16bd36b71fb3a4d23eb (patch)
tree5ef10d7913518fabdec64976fcac3135bed0efc1 /dev-python/exam
parentsys-kernel/gentoo-kernel-bin: Bump to 5.9.14 (diff)
downloadgentoo-b0efa69df19e722ea87fa16bd36b71fb3a4d23eb.tar.gz
gentoo-b0efa69df19e722ea87fa16bd36b71fb3a4d23eb.tar.bz2
gentoo-b0efa69df19e722ea87fa16bd36b71fb3a4d23eb.zip
dev-python/*: add pypi remote-ids
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-python/exam')
-rw-r--r--dev-python/exam/metadata.xml27
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/dev-python/exam/metadata.xml b/dev-python/exam/metadata.xml
index e782094b1d21..6a0cf1208102 100644
--- a/dev-python/exam/metadata.xml
+++ b/dev-python/exam/metadata.xml
@@ -1,18 +1,19 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd">
<pkgmetadata>
- <maintainer type="person">
- <email>lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com</email>
- <name>Alessandro Barbieri</name>
- </maintainer>
- <maintainer type="project">
- <email>proxy-maint@gentoo.org</email>
- <name>Proxy Maintainers</name>
- </maintainer>
- <upstream>
- <remote-id type="github">fluxx/exam</remote-id>
- </upstream>
- <longdescription lang="en">
+ <maintainer type="person">
+ <email>lssndrbarbieri@gmail.com</email>
+ <name>Alessandro Barbieri</name>
+ </maintainer>
+ <maintainer type="project">
+ <email>proxy-maint@gentoo.org</email>
+ <name>Proxy Maintainers</name>
+ </maintainer>
+ <upstream>
+ <remote-id type="github">fluxx/exam</remote-id>
+ <remote-id type="pypi">exam</remote-id>
+ </upstream>
+ <longdescription lang="en">
Exam is a Python toolkit for writing better tests. It aims to remove a lot of the boiler plate testing code one often writes, while still following Python conventions and adhering to the unit testing interface.
Aside from the obvious "does the code work?", writings tests has many additional goals and benefits:
@@ -24,5 +25,5 @@ Aside from the obvious "does the code work?", writings tests has many additional
Unfortunately, the common pattern for writing Python unit tests tends to not offer any of these advantages. Often times results in inefficient and unnecessarily obtuse testing code. Additionally, common uses of the mock library can often result in repetitive boiler-plate code or inefficiency during test runs.
exam aims to improve the state of Python test writing by providing a toolkit of useful functionality to make writing quick, correct and useful tests and as painless as possible.
- </longdescription>
+ </longdescription>
</pkgmetadata>