1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
# Copyright 2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Tests for PR gdb/1250.
# 2003-07-15 Michael Chastain <mec@shout.net>
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
if $tracelevel then {
strace $tracelevel
}
#
# test running programs
#
set testfile "gdb1250"
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
untested gdb1250.exp
return -1
}
gdb_exit
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
if ![runto abort {allow-pending}] then {
continue
}
# See http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
#
# In a nutshell: the function 'beta' ends with a call to 'abort', which
# is a noreturn function. So the last instruction of 'beta' is a call
# to 'abort'. When gdb looks for information about the caller of
# 'beta', it looks at the instruction after the call to 'abort' -- which
# is the first instruction of 'alpha'! So gdb uses the wrong frame
# information. It thinks that the test program is in 'alpha' and that
# the prologue "push %ebp / mov %esp,%ebp" has not been executed yet,
# and grabs the wrong values.
#
# By the nature of the bug, it could pass if the C compiler is not smart
# enough to implement 'abort' as a noreturn function. This is okay.
# The real point is that users often put breakpoints on noreturn
# functions such as 'abort' or some kind of exitting function, and those
# breakpoints should work.
gdb_test_multiple "backtrace" "backtrace from abort" {
-re "#0.*abort.*\r\n#1.*beta.*\r\n#2.*alpha.*\r\n#3.*main.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "backtrace from abort"
}
-re "#0.*abort.*\r\n#1.*beta.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
# This happens with gdb HEAD as of 2003-07-13, with gcc 3.3,
# binutils 2.14, either -gdwarf-2 or -gstabs+, on native
# i686-pc-linux-gnu.
#
# gdb gets 'abort' and 'beta' right and then goes into the
# weeds.
kfail "gdb/1250" "backtrace from abort"
}
}
|
GitWeb