| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bump copyright of touched ebuilds to 2024
Signed-off-by: Lucio Sauer <watermanpaint@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead, ignore the 'unicode' flag when 'ncurses' is disabled. This
option only affects the 'watch' command, which is only built with
ncurses support.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/928534
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Holger for reporting.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/584076
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/625312
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/675420
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/835813
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913210
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913408
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported by genr8eofl, this is actually for app-misc/uptimed...
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/898830
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We set the right bits in crossdev for musl targets now and, in theory, while
unlikely, it is possible that some cross targets don't have the right behaviour
anyway (not that i'm aware of any in use).
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/705800
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/835813
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/552720
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Force the value of the configure test given upstream
neglect the result and it builds fine with it. The test
is too aggressive in cross-compile situations and gives
unreliable results.
See also: lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2011-04/msg00019.html
See: 0498c7f2801e67309d52220fe1492e37d9434df9
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Conditionally apply a patch from ::musl for building on
musl (to facilitate stage building).
A different (better) approach was taken upstream and will
result in a --disable-w configure option in the next release,
but we're not there yet.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/794997
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: David Seifert <soap@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="s390"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.17, Repoman-3.0.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="hppa sparc"
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="x86"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/778179
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.13, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: David Michael <fedora.dm0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
File collision for ps(1) manpage.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/769773
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported-by: Timo Rothenpieler <timo@rothenpieler.org>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/767217
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.14, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
stable wrt bug #737498
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.5, Repoman-3.0.1
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc64"
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.4, Repoman-3.0.1
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="hppa"
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@sf-mail.de>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="x86"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="s390"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Roy Yang <royyang@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
m68k and ~m68k trees are inconsistent. Let's drop keywords
down to ~m68k only. Profiles already accept both keywords:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="m68k ~m68k"
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|